Arch partition is scary

Hey drop us a line about the show. Feel free to ask questions, provide feedback and criticism, or just ramble on about anything your little heart desires.

Moderators: snarkout, Patrick, dann

Post Reply
User avatar
Jza
Posts: 466
Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2005 7:01 pm
Location: Mexico
Contact:

Arch partition is scary

Post by Jza » Fri Apr 14, 2006 12:30 am

Ok there I said it, after nuking my data partition I have to admit that not only it is scary but confusing. The way arch guide u through the porocess of partitioning is a piain in the neck and a hassard. IT almost sound as if they did it on porpouse.

Ok thats my rant, and the reason is simple, why will they put partitions by the name of the system.

/dev/disk0/part1
/dev/disk0/part2
/dev/disk0/part3
/dev/disk0/part5
/dev/disk0/part6
/dev/disk0/part7
/dev/disk0/part8

Ok if this is not confusing then what is. I mean this process is after you arleady wrote a patition table isnt it that hard to show u the actual filesystem.

The confusing part with the list before is that there is only 5 partitions so where did this 8 come from. I would agree that there might be some hidden partitions but for god sake put at least the filesystem or the sixze of the disk.

Ok you can tell I just lost data.
Alexandro COLORADO

User avatar
snarkout
Site Admin
Posts: 1342
Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2005 9:35 pm

Post by snarkout » Fri Apr 14, 2006 7:32 am

If you have anything using devfs like that on your system, it's likely you're using an old version of the arch install disk. The latest image uses udev by default.
Shared pain is lessened, shared joy is increased; thus do we refute entropy.
--Spider Robinson

User avatar
Gomer_X
Posts: 901
Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 1:31 pm
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
Contact:

Re: Arch partition is scary

Post by Gomer_X » Fri Apr 14, 2006 1:56 pm

Jza wrote: The confusing part with the list before is that there is only 5 partitions so where did this 8 come from. I would agree that there might be some hidden partitions but for god sake put at least the filesystem or the sixze of the disk.
A partition table can hold 4 primary partitions (1-4). To get more than 4 partitions you need an extended partition, which can then be divided into logical partitions (numbered 5-8 ).

So you have

Code: Select all

part1
part2
part3 (extended)
       /--------
       |  part5
       |  part6
       |  part7
       |  part8
       \--------
So you have 6 actual partitions. Partition 1 or 2 is probably swap, with the final 5 being actual data partitions.

User avatar
Jza
Posts: 466
Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2005 7:01 pm
Location: Mexico
Contact:

Post by Jza » Fri Apr 14, 2006 2:36 pm

But why it shows 8 when I just have 5 partitions through the whole HD (including swap)/
Alexandro COLORADO

User avatar
Gomer_X
Posts: 901
Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 1:31 pm
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
Contact:

Post by Gomer_X » Mon Apr 17, 2006 8:38 am

Read what I wrote again. Partition 3 holds partitions 5-8. You actually have 6 partitions.

1
2
5
6
7
8

That's 6. Note that there is no partition 4, and partition 3 isn't a data partition. Why you have 6 when you think there are only 5 I don't know.

Use fdisk, and have a look around. Your /etc/fstab should also give clues.

Post Reply