Page 1 of 1

First reviews of Fedora Core 6

Posted: Wed Oct 25, 2006 10:05 am
by Patrick
http://lunapark6.com/?p=2454
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=573

I started the download of the DVD iso last night off of bittorrent. I will definitely give FC6 a good look.

Re: First reviews of Fedora Core 6

Posted: Wed Oct 25, 2006 10:20 am
by Gomer_X
Patrick wrote:I started the download of the DVD iso last night off of bittorrent. I will definitely give FC6 a good look.
The servers seemed to be getting hammered to hell and back. Bittorrent is the only way to go. I finished my download last night and am seeding now.

I'll probably try a test install some day soon. I usually give it a few weeks and watch the mailing lists before I install.

Re: First reviews of Fedora Core 6

Posted: Wed Oct 25, 2006 11:24 am
by Tsuroerusu
Gomer_X wrote:
Patrick wrote:I started the download of the DVD iso last night off of bittorrent. I will definitely give FC6 a good look.
The servers seemed to be getting hammered to hell and back. Bittorrent is the only way to go. I finished my download last night and am seeding now.

I'll probably try a test install some day soon. I usually give it a few weeks and watch the mailing lists before I install.
I have it running on my G4 PowerPC Mac mini, seems really nice. There's just some bugs in Compiz that puts like a pink color layer on top of the normal desktop, which leaves it pretty much unusable. I'm quite sure that this is a problem with Compiz, as AIGLX by itself, is turned on automatically as soon as X.Org notices the right driver support.

Besides that little problem, Fedora Core 6 seems really nice, except for my classic Fedora complaint which is the ugly-ass BlueCurve icons and uglifyment of KDE.
The new Echo icon theme should be ready for Fedora Core 7, I very much look forward to that, the death of BlueCurve is something I look forward to! :lol: :lol: :lol:


As an early warning for Pat, YUM is still quite slow, it has gotten quite a bit faster when updating the repositories, but facinatingly, it's only a snitch faster than the piece of shit ZENworks system that Novell put into SUSE.

Re: First reviews of Fedora Core 6

Posted: Wed Oct 25, 2006 3:22 pm
by gorkon
Patrick wrote:http://lunapark6.com/?p=2454
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=573

I started the download of the DVD iso last night off of bittorrent. I will definitely give FC6 a good look.
I downloaded off of a mirror. The torrent was damn slow on my network even though everything was working. Time Warner was probably throttling it to hell and back. Poked around and got a mirror and got the DVD iso and verified the HASH. Started the burn before work....it should be done now.

Re: First reviews of Fedora Core 6

Posted: Wed Oct 25, 2006 3:23 pm
by gorkon
Tsuroerusu wrote:
Gomer_X wrote:
Patrick wrote:I started the download of the DVD iso last night off of bittorrent. I will definitely give FC6 a good look.
The servers seemed to be getting hammered to hell and back. Bittorrent is the only way to go. I finished my download last night and am seeding now.

I'll probably try a test install some day soon. I usually give it a few weeks and watch the mailing lists before I install.
I have it running on my G4 PowerPC Mac mini, seems really nice. There's just some bugs in Compiz that puts like a pink color layer on top of the normal desktop, which leaves it pretty much unusable. I'm quite sure that this is a problem with Compiz, as AIGLX by itself, is turned on automatically as soon as X.Org notices the right driver support.

Besides that little problem, Fedora Core 6 seems really nice, except for my classic Fedora complaint which is the ugly-ass BlueCurve icons and uglifyment of KDE.
The new Echo icon theme should be ready for Fedora Core 7, I very much look forward to that, the death of BlueCurve is something I look forward to! :lol: :lol: :lol:


As an early warning for Pat, YUM is still quite slow, it has gotten quite a bit faster when updating the repositories, but facinatingly, it's only a snitch faster than the piece of shat ZENworks system that Novell put into SUSE.
Keep in mind...the YUM repos are usually on the same servers as the ISO's. It being slow now should not be a surprise.

Re: First reviews of Fedora Core 6

Posted: Thu Oct 26, 2006 8:30 am
by Gomer_X
Tsuroerusu wrote:I have it running on my G4 PowerPC Mac mini, seems really nice. There's just some bugs in Compiz that puts like a pink color layer on top of the normal desktop, which leaves it pretty much unusable. I'm quite sure that this is a problem with Compiz, as AIGLX by itself, is turned on automatically as soon as X.Org notices the right driver support.
You should file a bug on this. From everything I've read, Metacity should be used be default. Compiz needs to be turned on in the "Desktop Effects" menu to work.
Tsuroerusu wrote:As an early warning for Pat, YUM is still quite slow, it has gotten quite a bit faster when updating the repositories, but facinatingly, it's only a snitch faster than the piece of shat ZENworks system that Novell put into SUSE.
As has been noted, the servers are getting hammered. Don't blame yum for a slow internet connection. Yum can not fix the internet. :D

Posted: Tue Oct 31, 2006 7:26 am
by Patrick
My quick and dirty review of Fedora Core 6:
http://pdavila.homelinux.org:8080/blog/?p=173

I'm sure we'll talk about this and Ubuntu/Kubuntu on Wednesday's show after the interview segment.

Posted: Tue Oct 31, 2006 8:28 am
by Gomer_X
Patrick wrote:My quick and dirty review of Fedora Core 6:
http://pdavila.homelinux.org:8080/blog/?p=173
Yast is definitely faster than previous versions
You were probably referring to yum, not Yast.

Other than that, I'm guessing problems with repository access during install may be because the servers are overloaded. The Extras repositories have never had to deal with this kind of load before. They also depend on Livna, which has few mirrors.

Still, it should fail-over gracefully and fix itself later.

Posted: Tue Oct 31, 2006 8:31 am
by Patrick
Gomer_X wrote:You were probably referring to yum, not Yast.
Thanks for the catch. Fixed.