Page 1 of 2
Crapple's file system "complete and utter crap" says Linus
Posted: Tue Feb 05, 2008 3:44 pm
by greggh
http://www.smh.com.au/news/technology/u ... 93959.html
"I don't think they're equally flawed - I think Leopard is a much better system," he said. "(But) OS X in some ways is actually worse than Windows to program for. Their file system is complete and utter crap, which is scary."
He poured scorn on the modern trend to treat a new version or update of an operating system as a cause for major celebration and marketing.
"An operating system should be completely invisible," he said. "To Microsoft and Apple (it is) a way to control the whole environment ... to force people to upgrade their applications and hardware."

Re: Crapple's file system "complete and utter crap" says Linus
Posted: Tue Feb 05, 2008 7:00 pm
by allix
Do mac users really care about a file system? As long as they can do what they want they are happy.
I do wonder what Linus actually said....
Re: Crapple's file system "complete and utter crap" says Linus
Posted: Tue Feb 05, 2008 8:32 pm
by greggh
allix wrote:I do wonder what Linus actually said....
I don't understand. What Linus said is quoted in my post...
"(But) OS X in some ways is actually worse than Windows to program for. Their file system is complete and utter crap, which is scary."
Re: Crapple's file system "complete and utter crap" says Linus
Posted: Tue Feb 05, 2008 9:41 pm
by Wally Balljacker
And do Apple users care? No. OS X is a desktop operating system, it's not designed for supercomputers.
Re: Crapple's file system "complete and utter crap" says Linus
Posted: Tue Feb 05, 2008 10:36 pm
by greggh
I'm no computer science expert, but I'm going to go out on a limb here and speculate that having an OS with a file system that isn't complete and utter crap is helpful even for non-supercomputers.
Re: Crapple's file system "complete and utter crap" says Linus
Posted: Tue Feb 05, 2008 10:44 pm
by Wally Balljacker
greggh wrote:I'm no computer science expert, but I'm going to go out on a limb here and speculate that having an OS with a file system that isn't complete and utter crap is helpful even for non-supercomputers.
It doesn't seem to matter with Apple hitting record sales.
Re: Crapple's file system "complete and utter crap" says Linus
Posted: Tue Feb 05, 2008 10:51 pm
by davijordan
Re: Crapple's file system "complete and utter crap" says Linus
Posted: Tue Feb 05, 2008 10:52 pm
by greggh
Wally Balljacker wrote:greggh wrote:I'm no computer science expert, but I'm going to go out on a limb here and speculate that having an OS with a file system that isn't complete and utter crap is helpful even for non-supercomputers.
It doesn't seem to matter with Apple hitting record sales.
Touche!

Re: Crapple's file system "complete and utter crap" says Linus
Posted: Tue Feb 05, 2008 10:55 pm
by greggh
Yeah, but they're all running Slackintosh.
These photos are from the Virginia Tech Supercomputer Cluster composed of 1100 PowerMac G5's.
Re: Crapple's file system "complete and utter crap" says Linus
Posted: Tue Feb 05, 2008 11:06 pm
by Wally Balljacker
The University of Maine also has a cluster of 512 core Apple Xserve G5 nodes running Linux (Gentoo)
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/cluster/
It's no surprise that Linux owns the clustering/supercomputing sector. It's clearly better than anything else on a technical level.

Re: Crapple's file system "complete and utter crap" says Linus
Posted: Wed Feb 06, 2008 2:17 am
by davijordan
http://www.apple.com/science/solutions/ ... uster.html
I am becoming less enamored with apple osx. Unless you do command line, It was always easier to multitask under xp or linux. Files and settings seemed to disappear sometimes on the Apples where I used to work. Our personal macs are getting the linux treatment now. No more problems!!!
I do not know anything about computer science either. But, I pretend to play someone who does on tv. (not really...) My younger brother won't use a mac, actually has a masters in cs. I usually ignore the way he does things anyway. It is more fun not knowing what you are doing.
Re: Crapple's file system "complete and utter crap" says Linus
Posted: Wed Feb 06, 2008 1:50 pm
by greggh
Tit for Tat
http://blogs.cnet.com/8301-13505_1-9865 ... heOpenRoad
Linus Torvalds: Mac OS X and Windows can't hold a candle to Linux
Linus Torvalds woke up on Mars today (or maybe it was Oz), and had this to say about Windows Vista and Apple's OS X:
I don't think they're equally flawed. I think Leopard is a much better system. On the other hand, (I've found) OS X in some ways is actually worse than Windows to program for. Their file system is complete and utter crap, which is scary. I think OS X is nicer than Windows in many ways, but neither can hold a candle to my own (Linux). It's a race to second place.
I guess when you're famous you can say inane things and get away with it. Yes, Linux does some things better than Mac OS X and Microsoft's Windows Vista on the desktop (security, maybe), but let's be honest: the Linux desktop is "utter crap" compared to either OS X or Windows when it comes to the thing that matters most: usability.
If normal people can't use it, it just doesn't matter how beautifully architected it is. Sorry, Linus. Everyone has to be wrong sometimes. This is your turn to shine.
The emphasized text above was my doing.
Please, won't you think of all the normal people?
When did
normal people come to mean everybody that's too retarded or lazy to learn a few new things to use their computer?
Re: Crapple's file system "complete and utter crap" says Linus
Posted: Wed Feb 06, 2008 3:29 pm
by Tsuroerusu
greggh wrote:Tit for Tat
http://blogs.cnet.com/8301-13505_1-9865 ... heOpenRoad
Linus Torvalds: Mac OS X and Windows can't hold a candle to Linux
Linus Torvalds woke up on Mars today (or maybe it was Oz), and had this to say about Windows Vista and Apple's OS X:
I don't think they're equally flawed. I think Leopard is a much better system. On the other hand, (I've found) OS X in some ways is actually worse than Windows to program for. Their file system is complete and utter crap, which is scary. I think OS X is nicer than Windows in many ways, but neither can hold a candle to my own (Linux). It's a race to second place.
I guess when you're famous you can say inane things and get away with it. Yes, Linux does some things better than Mac OS X and Microsoft's Windows Vista on the desktop (security, maybe), but let's be honest: the Linux desktop is "utter crap" compared to either OS X or Windows when it comes to the thing that matters most: usability.
If normal people can't use it, it just doesn't matter how beautifully architected it is. Sorry, Linus. Everyone has to be wrong sometimes. This is your turn to shine.
The emphasized text above was my doing.
Please, won't you think of all the normal people?
When did
normal people come to mean everybody that's too retarded or lazy to learn a few new things to use their computer?
greggh, you and I, and all on this board, are above the brainless drones that is "normal people", because we have a need to actually think!

/partially sarcastic
Re: Crapple's file system "complete and utter crap" says Linus
Posted: Wed Feb 06, 2008 4:30 pm
by Vogateer
That Matt Asay article is ridiculous. Linus says Apple's HFS+ is crap, and Asay acts like he's talking about the user interface. Yeah, I can see where he might get confused, because I know when I hear "filesystem" I just immediately think of the entire graphical user interface. The two terms are practically interchangeable. What ludicrous garbage.
Honestly, I try to keep a list of professional trolls who wish they were Dvorak or Rob Enderle, but it's almost impossible to keep up with them all, there are just so many imitators out there writing shocking, misleading headlines and badly written articles. In this article, I don't think you can even qualify it as "taking a quote out of context" because the quote IS in context, and the filesystem part is mentioned in the quote, and Matt Asay just went ahead and intentionally misconstrued the quote anyway to suit his trollish purposes.
Even if Linus had been talking about the UI, "Normal people" can't use OS X, either, judging by my experience with a dozen iMacs and just as many "normal people" at work. I get a barrage of questions, daily, concerning just about everything. OS X still holds on to some bad UI decisions, like the Menu bar at the top of the screen. Separating the menus from the application window just makes for confused users who haven't learned the concept of applications having "focus." The dock doesn't really register with them either, apparently, judging from the number of users who choose to move a window down near the bottom of the screen instead of minimizing it to the dock. And you can just forget about the nightmare printing to multiple printers.
Re: Crapple's file system "complete and utter crap" says Linus
Posted: Thu Feb 07, 2008 10:40 am
by davijordan
That reminds me of the hassle that os/x had with non-postscript networked printers. I had a nightmare trying to print on a networked hp injet until I installed gutenprint. I never really had a problem working with multiple printers though.
I remember years ago when according to the trades the Apple community was not enamored with Digital Research (GEM) and Microsoft (ms windows) suggesting they were copycats. At the little store I worked at, we were give notice from our vendors that we might have to pull those products off the shelf.
Things never seem to change. After listening to all the gui/wysiwyg wars, maybe using only the command line might actually have some virtue.