Page 1 of 2
KANOTIX 2005-04 Released
Posted: Sun Jan 01, 2006 8:12 am
by Tsuroerusu
KANOTIX 2005-04 was released only hours ago, but I guess Kano go it out before 2005 was over
I'm sure Pat's jumping up and down in joy already!
Announcement:
http://kanotix.com/Article56.html
Re: KANOTIX 2005-04 Released
Posted: Sun Jan 01, 2006 8:59 am
by Patrick
Tsuroerusu wrote:KANOTIX 2005-04 was released only hours ago, but I guess Kano go it out before 2005 was over
I'm sure Pat's jumping up and down in joy already!
Announcement:
http://kanotix.com/Article56.html
Sweet, considering I'm installing linux on my dads machine today. Downloading it right now.
Thanks for the heads up and Happy New Year!
Posted: Sun Jan 01, 2006 11:49 am
by Judland
What I found surprising is that it's released with KDE 3.4.3 rather than 3.5.
Hmmm.... Kanotix was cutting edge at one time. Is KDE 3.5 not part of Debian SID yet?
Posted: Sun Jan 01, 2006 11:54 am
by Tsuroerusu
Judland wrote:Is KDE 3.5 not part of Debian SID yet?
Nope not yet, it's in "experimental".
Posted: Sun Jan 01, 2006 12:03 pm
by Judland
Tsuroerusu wrote:Nope not yet, it's in "experimental".
Well, that explains it. Thanks!
Posted: Sun Jan 01, 2006 12:08 pm
by Tsuroerusu
Judland wrote:Tsuroerusu wrote:Nope not yet, it's in "experimental".
Well, that explains it. Thanks!
No problem man, it doesn't surprise at all though, the Debian guys are like snails to add new stuff, compared to Mandriva, SUSE, Arch and Ubuntu.
Posted: Sun Jan 01, 2006 3:37 pm
by Wally Balljacker
Tsuroerusu wrote:Judland wrote:Tsuroerusu wrote:Nope not yet, it's in "experimental".
Well, that explains it. Thanks!
No problem man, it doesn't surprise at all though, the Debian guys are like snails to add new stuff, compared to Mandriva, SUSE, Arch and Ubuntu.
Some people prefer stability over the latest version number. Debian's testing process is far more rigorous, and time consuming than other distros.
Posted: Sun Jan 01, 2006 3:57 pm
by Tsuroerusu
Wally Balljacker wrote:Tsuroerusu wrote:Judland wrote:
Well, that explains it. Thanks!
No problem man, it doesn't surprise at all though, the Debian guys are like snails to add new stuff, compared to Mandriva, SUSE, Arch and Ubuntu.
Some people prefer stability over the latest version number. Debian's testing process is far more rigorous, and time consuming than other distros.
Yeah, but you absoloutely can make a very stable distro without taking like 18 months or whatever between releases! Debian's release cycle is ridiculous IMO, once a year could be acceptable if they would provide updates to stuff like GNOME and KDE in a stable manner so people don't have to hang around Debian unstable and waiting for the system to brake.
Posted: Sun Jan 01, 2006 4:40 pm
by Wally Balljacker
Tsuroerusu wrote:Wally Balljacker wrote:Tsuroerusu wrote:
No problem man, it doesn't surprise at all though, the Debian guys are like snails to add new stuff, compared to Mandriva, SUSE, Arch and Ubuntu.
Some people prefer stability over the latest version number. Debian's testing process is far more rigorous, and time consuming than other distros.
Yeah, but you absoloutely can make a very stable distro without taking like 18 months or whatever between releases! Debian's release cycle is ridiculous IMO, once a year could be acceptable if they would provide updates to stuff like GNOME and KDE in a stable manner so people don't have to hang around Debian unstable and waiting for the system to brake.
Debian stable isn't optimal for desktop use, no. It's made for server use. There's a reason why Debian is on 1.2 million web servers: it's rock solid, and it just works. Debian testing which I use on the desktop is great, because you get relatively up to date software (
link), without being bleeding edge, and aren't subject to the breakage that running pure unstable has. I love using a distro that has 4 different release branches, because I can choose exactly how current I want to be. I don't know of any other distro that offers that kind of flexibility.
Posted: Sun Jan 01, 2006 5:42 pm
by Judland
Debian, as with all Linux distros., has its place. It does what it's designed to do. It also provides a choice, which is what Linux is all about.
Myself, I like exploring the new features and innovations on the desktop. Unfortunately, SID was just going through too many problems recently for my taste.
Posted: Sun Jan 01, 2006 6:00 pm
by Tsuroerusu
Wally Balljacker wrote:Debian stable isn't optimal for desktop use, no. It's made for server use. There's a reason why Debian is on 1.2 million web servers: it's rock solid, and it just works.
Of course, Debian is great for that, who needs KDE for servers.
Wally Balljacker wrote:Debian testing which I use on the desktop is great, because you get relatively up to date software (
link), without being bleeding edge, and aren't subject to the breakage that running pure unstable has. I love using a distro that has 4 different release branches, because I can choose exactly how current I want to be. I don't know of any other distro that offers that kind of flexibility.
Flexibility you say? I think Gentoo has an edge there, but then again most of us don't like compiling all the time
Debian is great I agree, too bad FSF doesn't like it anymore.
Posted: Sun Jan 01, 2006 6:11 pm
by Wally Balljacker
Judland wrote:Debian, as with all Linux distros., has its place. It does what it's designed to do. It also provides a choice, which is what Linux is all about.
Myself, I like exploring the new features and innovations on the desktop. Unfortunately, SID was just going through too many problems recently for my taste.
I too like exploring the latest free open source software. That's why KANOTIX, and live CDs in general are great, because I can run them off the CD, and check out the newest applications without messing with my Debian installation.

Posted: Sun Jan 01, 2006 6:14 pm
by Tsuroerusu
Wally Balljacker wrote:I too like exploring the latest free open source software. That's why KANOTIX, and live CDs in general are great, because I can run them off the CD, and check out the newest applications without messing with my Debian installation.

Hehe as Marcel Gagné said when he was on the show almost a year ago: "LiveCDs Rock People!"
I was happy I used a LiveCD to try out the first version of Kubuntu, because that thing was buggier than the last alpha version of SUSE I tested.
Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2006 12:38 am
by no1important
I will probabley move to "Underground Desktop" or try iy on my other hard drive in the next month or so, but if I were to install this over my current Kanotix on my main hard drive, would I lose everything? Like files, settings etc? I have it set up nice now and do not want to lose it all by installing a newer version.
Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2006 7:30 am
by Judland
If the current Kanotix installer is anything like the beta release a few months back, the only files you would not lose (by installing the new version of Kanotix) is what's in your /home directory.
I do believe that everything else will get over-written. Someone please correct me if I'm mistaken.