Page 1 of 1

U.S. Grants Patent For Broad Range Of Internet Rich Apps

Posted: Thu Feb 23, 2006 11:18 am
by Judland
Get this!
A patent has been granted to a relatively unknown California Web-design firm for an invention its creator says covers the design and creation of most rich-media applications used over the Internet...

...The patent... covers all rich-media technology implementations, including Flash, Flex, Java, Ajax, and XAML, when the rich-media application is accessed on any device over the Internet, including desktops, mobile devices, set-top boxes, and video game consoles...

...anybody who does anything with rich applications will have to pay royalties to the company....

...he will most likely sell the patent rather than enforce it himself. He says he's discussing the sale of the patent to "top-tier players. I don't want to name them but they're fairly obvious, the guys who are investing a lot of money in this rich Internet applications field....
My advice to companies like Adobe, Macromedia, and such... get the hell out of the U.S. and establish your business in a country that doesn't issue such ridiculous patents.

Ideas like this belongs to the human race, not one individual. It's not like this guy actually invented the software to do the rich content... just the idea.

Yeah, well I have an idea about hard wiring your mobile phone right into your scull... guess I better go get a patent on that one! I also have an idea of putting a toilet roll dispenser up your own ass... so you don't have to waste time wiping it by hand. Got to get that one patented, too!

Just think where we'd be (or wouldn't be, for that matter) if some Egyptian patented the idea of farming! Give me a break!

Re: U.S. Grants Patent For Broad Range Of Internet Rich Apps

Posted: Thu Feb 23, 2006 12:20 pm
by Gomer_X
Judland wrote: My advice to companies like Adobe, Macromedia, and such... get the hell out of the U.S. and establish your business in a country that doesn't issue such ridiculous patents.

Ideas like this belongs to the human race, not one individual. It's not like this guy actually invented the software to do the rich content... just the idea.
I think the line of companies that can show prior art should be pretty long. I wouldn't get too bent out of shape about it. Do you think this guy is succesfully going to sue Google? :D

Posted: Thu Feb 23, 2006 12:27 pm
by Judland
Yeah, you're probably right... but this sort of stuff just ticks me off. All this legal crap is starting to get to me. :shock:

I mean, we've even gotten to the point where medical research companies want to own the DNA strands they're discovering that exist in your body. Like I owe them something for simply existing. It's just getting out of hand.

My apologies.

Posted: Fri Feb 24, 2006 10:08 am
by Gomer_X
Judland wrote:Yeah, you're probably right... but this sort of stuff just ticks me off. All this legal crap is starting to get to me. :shock:

I mean, we've even gotten to the point where medical research companies want to own the DNA strands they're discovering that exist in your body. Like I owe them something for simply existing. It's just getting out of hand.

My apologies.
From a closer read of the article, the company that holds the patent really believes this is defensible. If it is, the most likely thing is someone like Google or Microsoft will buy the patent then either license it or just sue everyone else in the world.

It'll be interesting to see what happens. Definitely some lawsuits on the way.