"Apple has closed down Mac OS X by refusing to release the source code for Intel version of the Darwin open source Mach/Unix core--in part due to the fear of users pirating the operating system for cheaper PC clones"
http://www.macnn.com/articles/06/05/17/ ... cked.down/
digg it - http://digg.com/apple/Apple_locks_down_ ... _for_Intel
Apple refuses to release source code for x86
Moderators: snarkout, Patrick, dann
-
Wally Balljacker
- Posts: 1227
- Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 3:32 am
- Location: University of Massachusetts - Lowell
- Contact:
Not a big loss; unlike 20 years ago, the community already has a working kernel
If you really wanted a better price to performance ratio on your server/workstation, you wouldn't be using OS X to begin withfrom article wrote: Performance is one reason users may want a custom kernel--especially with the forthcoming release of server- or workstation-based Macs using 64-bit Intel ships (rather than the 32-bit chips used in current Intel-based Macs).
"Apple's retreat to a proprietary kernel means that all users must accept a fixed level of performance. The default OS X kernels are built for broad compatibility rather than breakneck speed and throughput," according to the report.