Damn, KDE 3.5 is nice

Hey drop us a line about the show. Feel free to ask questions, provide feedback and criticism, or just ramble on about anything your little heart desires.

Moderators: snarkout, Patrick, dann

Post Reply
User avatar
Wally Balljacker
Posts: 1227
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 3:32 am
Location: University of Massachusetts - Lowell
Contact:

Damn, KDE 3.5 is nice

Post by Wally Balljacker » Sun Feb 12, 2006 5:51 am

I've never been a huge KDE fan before, but I just installed 3.5 on my other machine and I'm liking it alot. Konqueror seems to render pages alot better now, and it's quite fast too. There's also quite a few little GUI improvements I've been noticing as well. Good stuff.

Tsuroerusu
Posts: 2551
Joined: Mon Sep 05, 2005 8:51 am
Location: Silkeborg, Denmark
Contact:

Post by Tsuroerusu » Sun Feb 12, 2006 6:33 am

I have a virtual instance of KDE 3.5 running in VMware and it just flyes, at least on my machine, the myths that KDE is super slow, bloated and ugly are absolutely false! :wink:

Even when I have PC-BSD running under SUSE Linux, aka two KDE sessions on the same memory, it just runs quite nicely. Sure XFCE is faster, but to say that KDE is slow, not true in my opinion.
Image
Image

"Hatred does not cease by hatred, but only by love. This is the eternal rule."
- Siddhattha Gotama (Buddha), founder of Buddhism.

User avatar
Wally Balljacker
Posts: 1227
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 3:32 am
Location: University of Massachusetts - Lowell
Contact:

Post by Wally Balljacker » Sun Feb 12, 2006 7:00 am

Tsuroerusu wrote:I have a virtual instance of KDE 3.5 running in VMware and it just flyes, at least on my machine, the myths that KDE is super slow, bloated and ugly are absolutely false! :wink:

Even when I have PC-BSD running under SUSE Linux, aka two KDE sessions on the same memory, it just runs quite nicely. Sure XFCE is faster, but to say that KDE is slow, not true in my opinion.
KDE definitely isn't slow. Not with 512MB of RAM anyway. Compared to GNOME on the same machine, KDE 3.5 is noticeably faster. Right now I have every GUI effect/animation turned on, and it's still pretty quick. I'm also really digging Amarok, Kopete, Konqueror, and alot of the integration that goes along with KDE.

Tsuroerusu
Posts: 2551
Joined: Mon Sep 05, 2005 8:51 am
Location: Silkeborg, Denmark
Contact:

Post by Tsuroerusu » Sun Feb 12, 2006 7:13 am

Wally Balljacker wrote:KDE definitely isn't slow. Not with 512MB of RAM anyway. Compared to GNOME on the same machine, KDE 3.5 is noticeably faster. Right now I have every GUI effect/animation turned on, and it's still pretty quick. I'm also really digging Amarok, Kopete, Konqueror, and alot of the integration that goes along with KDE.
I have a bunch of friends who run KDE on machines with 256 - 384 MB, although with 256 it isn't quite as smooth as with 512, it's not like it's slow, it just takes like a second longer to bring up Konqueror and stuff like that, much more usable than Windows with Norton AntiVirus, if any piece of software in this world is big and bloated it's Norton AntiVirus and ZoneAlarm firewall.
Image
Image

"Hatred does not cease by hatred, but only by love. This is the eternal rule."
- Siddhattha Gotama (Buddha), founder of Buddhism.

Post Reply