FLASH 9 BETA!!!
Moderators: snarkout, Patrick, dann
- Wally Balljacker
- Posts: 1227
- Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 3:32 am
- Location: University of Massachusetts - Lowell
- Contact:
For those few remaining archers, it showed up in the AUR last night, too.
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?d ... =1&ID=7191
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?d ... =1&ID=7191
Shared pain is lessened, shared joy is increased; thus do we refute entropy.
--Spider Robinson
--Spider Robinson
- CptnObvious999
- Posts: 798
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 7:54 pm
- Location: Maryland
- Contact:
And maybe even Gmail will come out of Beta!Vogateer wrote:Will wonders never cease? Maybe E17 will finally come out of beta, too?
In portage too, w00t w00t! (hard masked of course)Snarkout wrote:For those few remaining archers, it showed up in the AUR last night, too.
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?d ... =1&ID=7191
http://www.gentoo-portage.com/net-www/netscape-flash
It was put in unstable before somebody uploaded a PKGBUILD to the AUR. Because of that, the AUR PKGBUILD has been removed. Here a link to the page for flashplugin-beta:Snarkout wrote:For those few remaining archers, it showed up in the AUR last night, too.
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?d ... =1&ID=7191
http://archlinux.org/packages/11988/
Installed it on my Fedora system this morning (Firefox 1.5.0.7) and I see no change. Flash works OK, but I have no new functionality. I didn't have time to test extensively, though. I hardly ever go to sites that use Flash, but my wife complains about Fox News not working (which I consider a feature, not a bug).
I may have SELinux problems to sort out.
I may have SELinux problems to sort out.
