Windows is actually greener than Linux

Hey drop us a line about the show. Feel free to ask questions, provide feedback and criticism, or just ramble on about anything your little heart desires.

Moderators: snarkout, Patrick, dann

Post Reply
User avatar
greggh
Posts: 1036
Joined: Fri Jun 02, 2006 7:17 pm
Location: Brooklyn, NY USA

Windows is actually greener than Linux

Post by greggh » Tue Oct 16, 2007 11:14 am


User avatar
Wally Balljacker
Posts: 1227
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 3:32 am
Location: University of Massachusetts - Lowell
Contact:

Re: Windows is actually greener than Linux

Post by Wally Balljacker » Tue Oct 16, 2007 11:51 am

When you take into account the fact that more and more old PCs get revived with Linux instead of being thrown in the dumpster, I think Linux is far more green. Linux geeks tend to keep their old machines around for years and years, the average Windows user buys a new PC every 3 years and chucks the old one in the rubbish. That seems a lot more wasteful than a few extra watts of power consumption.

User avatar
snarkout
Site Admin
Posts: 1342
Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2005 9:35 pm

Post by snarkout » Tue Oct 16, 2007 12:36 pm

Green aside, it'd be awfully nice if laptop tools and its ilk worked better. My battery consumption when running linux is just freaking *crazy* when compared to other people running similar or better hardware configs using other OSes.
Shared pain is lessened, shared joy is increased; thus do we refute entropy.
--Spider Robinson

User avatar
Gomer_X
Posts: 901
Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 1:31 pm
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
Contact:

Post by Gomer_X » Tue Oct 16, 2007 2:25 pm

Snarkout wrote:Green aside, it'd be awfully nice if laptop tools and its ilk worked better. My battery consumption when running linux is just freaking *crazy* when compared to other people running similar or better hardware configs using other OSes.
Tickless kernel is supposed to really help with laptop power usage. I don't know if anyone is shipping it yet.

I think the fact that this test was done on a laptop is pretty significant. Also, if you read the whole article, Fedora used the least power at idle.

User avatar
allix
Posts: 1079
Joined: Tue Dec 19, 2006 5:07 pm
Location: London, England
Contact:

Re: Windows is actually greener than Linux

Post by allix » Tue Oct 16, 2007 5:31 pm

Wally Balljacker wrote:When you take into account the fact that more and more old PCs get revived with Linux instead of being thrown in the dumpster, I think Linux is far more green. Linux geeks tend to keep their old machines around for years and years, the average Windows user buys a new PC every 3 years and chucks the old one in the rubbish. That seems a lot more wasteful than a few extra watts of power consumption.
I think that's a myth , linux users like to buy new hardware just as any windows user.
Sure they might keep there older computers longer.
Арте́льный горшо́к гу́ще кипи́т
Working as a team produces better results
Russian Proverb

User avatar
CptnObvious999
Posts: 798
Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 7:54 pm
Location: Maryland
Contact:

Post by CptnObvious999 » Tue Oct 16, 2007 8:31 pm

Once the ALPM patches are merged into the kernel I think we will be in the lead (http://www.lesswatts.org/results/desktop/index.php)

Also this is just Ubuntu's default configuration, you can probably tweak some settings and get it down with the help of powertop. I'm sure the desktop search is taking a fair amount of that power.

davijordan

Re: Windows is actually greener than Linux

Post by davijordan » Tue Oct 16, 2007 11:42 pm

allix wrote:
Wally Balljacker wrote:When you take into account the fact that more and more old PCs get revived with Linux instead of being thrown in the dumpster, I think Linux is far more green. Linux geeks tend to keep their old machines around for years and years, the average Windows user buys a new PC every 3 years and chucks the old one in the rubbish. That seems a lot more wasteful than a few extra watts of power consumption.
I think that's a myth , linux users like to buy new hardware just as any windows user.
Sure they might keep there older computers longer.
In the past couple of years, I have yet to see any of the linux users around here chunk a machine unless it was an eight or early 16 bitter. I have seen linux users pass older systems to other family members or charity where the systems would still be used. I have recently collected at least ten chunked machines which includes two laptops. None of them were from linux users. I will admit that hardcore linux (especially gamers) users who can afford it will get a new machine at the drop of a hat.

Tsuroerusu
Posts: 2551
Joined: Mon Sep 05, 2005 8:51 am
Location: Silkeborg, Denmark
Contact:

Post by Tsuroerusu » Wed Oct 17, 2007 3:57 am

Gomer_X wrote:
Snarkout wrote:Green aside, it'd be awfully nice if laptop tools and its ilk worked better. My battery consumption when running linux is just freaking *crazy* when compared to other people running similar or better hardware configs using other OSes.
Tickless kernel is supposed to really help with laptop power usage. I don't know if anyone is shipping it yet.
Fedora 7 included tick-less kernel support for x86, Fedora 8 will have tick-less for both x86 and AMD64.
Image
Image

"Hatred does not cease by hatred, but only by love. This is the eternal rule."
- Siddhattha Gotama (Buddha), founder of Buddhism.

User avatar
Gomer_X
Posts: 901
Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 1:31 pm
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
Contact:

Post by Gomer_X » Thu Oct 18, 2007 8:22 am

Tsuroerusu wrote:
Gomer_X wrote:Tickless kernel is supposed to really help with laptop power usage. I don't know if anyone is shipping it yet.
Fedora 7 included tick-less kernel support for x86, Fedora 8 will have tick-less for both x86 and AMD64.
The test in the article was done on Fedora 8 Test 3 (it says Fedora 7, but the caption says 8Test3). Maybe they didn't have tickless support enabled? My experience with test releases is that things can be pretty strange. Again, I don't think this is a very thorough and fair test.

Post Reply