A fully working VM for Hardy Host

Hey drop us a line about the show. Feel free to ask questions, provide feedback and criticism, or just ramble on about anything your little heart desires.

Moderators: snarkout, Patrick, dann

Post Reply
weex
Posts: 44
Joined: Fri Feb 29, 2008 3:30 am

A fully working VM for Hardy Host

Post by weex » Sat Jul 05, 2008 11:40 am

Hello,

I've tried getting VirtualBox OSE and VMWare server working on my Hardy laptop but VirtualBox(via synaptic) has a broken network adapter and the vmmon module for vmware won't compile on 2.6.24-18-generic(compains of predeclared uintptr, etc). So I'm looking for another way to run a couple virtual machines. KVM, Qemu, xen all come to mind but rather than try each one out, just wanted to ask here. Anyone have any luck with any of these running on top of Hardy?

Thanks in advance.

Tsuroerusu
Posts: 2551
Joined: Mon Sep 05, 2005 8:51 am
Location: Silkeborg, Denmark
Contact:

Re: A fully working VM for Hardy Host

Post by Tsuroerusu » Sat Jul 05, 2008 12:37 pm

Qemu emulates like a Pentium 2 or something, if you want something that actually runs fast, Qemu is a very bad choice IMO. It does have a "accelerator module", but I have found that to not work very well at all. In some cases I have had guest OSes crash when they tried probing something.

KVM, AFAIK, requires the availability of hardware assisted virtualization in the processor. I am referring to Intel's VT technology and AMD's AMD-V technology. Generally my feeling about KVM is immaturity, but I don't have much experience with it, so I could of course be mistaken.

Xen is pretty much only for server stuff. It doesn't provide a framebuffer or any other graphical pathway into the virtual machine like say VMware does, it's more like a server without a monitor, in other words, you have to SSH into it.
Image
Image

"Hatred does not cease by hatred, but only by love. This is the eternal rule."
- Siddhattha Gotama (Buddha), founder of Buddhism.

User avatar
snarkout
Site Admin
Posts: 1342
Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2005 9:35 pm

Re: A fully working VM for Hardy Host

Post by snarkout » Sat Jul 05, 2008 1:34 pm

I'm using Sun's evil binary virtualbox on Hardy for windows hosts and it works well enough - both wired and wifi on my t43 work fine in the guests. What's broken about your network adapter?
Shared pain is lessened, shared joy is increased; thus do we refute entropy.
--Spider Robinson

User avatar
Linc
Site Admin
Posts: 345
Joined: Mon Apr 26, 2004 11:54 pm
Contact:

Re: A fully working VM for Hardy Host

Post by Linc » Sun Jul 06, 2008 11:08 am

Tsuroerusu wrote: Xen is pretty much only for server stuff. It doesn't provide a framebuffer or any other graphical pathway into the virtual machine like say VMware does, it's more like a server without a monitor, in other words, you have to SSH into it.
Bologna. You get a fine gui console from virt-manager. Not to mention you can always stuff vncserver on the xen machine if you're so inclined.
-Linc Fessenden

In the Beginning there was nothing, which exploded - Yeah right...

Tsuroerusu
Posts: 2551
Joined: Mon Sep 05, 2005 8:51 am
Location: Silkeborg, Denmark
Contact:

Re: A fully working VM for Hardy Host

Post by Tsuroerusu » Sun Jul 06, 2008 11:58 am

Linc wrote:
Tsuroerusu wrote: Xen is pretty much only for server stuff. It doesn't provide a framebuffer or any other graphical pathway into the virtual machine like say VMware does, it's more like a server without a monitor, in other words, you have to SSH into it.
Bologna. You get a fine gui console from virt-manager.
Ah yes, of course, I can't believe I forgot that!
Linc wrote:Not to mention you can always stuff vncserver on the xen machine if you're so inclined.
That's true, and I think virt-manager with help with that, although I personally hate VNC, but that's just me, it's definitely an option, I agree with that.
Image
Image

"Hatred does not cease by hatred, but only by love. This is the eternal rule."
- Siddhattha Gotama (Buddha), founder of Buddhism.

Post Reply