Qt version of Mozilla/Firefox

Hey drop us a line about the show. Feel free to ask questions, provide feedback and criticism, or just ramble on about anything your little heart desires.

Moderators: snarkout, Patrick, dann

Post Reply
User avatar
Patrick
Site Admin
Posts: 2519
Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2004 11:38 am
Location: Easton, PA
Contact:

Qt version of Mozilla/Firefox

Post by Patrick » Wed Aug 13, 2008 6:22 am

The next version of the Maemo web browser will be based on Mozilla and Qt:
http://dot.kde.org/1218543988/

Screenshot:
Image

And the embedded version on Maemo:
Image


You can download the test version here:
http://browser.garage.maemo.org/news/10/
Ego contemno licentia

User avatar
allix
Posts: 1079
Joined: Tue Dec 19, 2006 5:07 pm
Location: London, England
Contact:

Re: Qt version of Mozilla/Firefox

Post by allix » Wed Aug 13, 2008 9:00 am

That is interesting, i don;t think it will make it any faster though, I believe xul is the bloated bit .
Troels will back me up on this but a less you have a beefy machine, firefox runs like a snail.
Арте́льный горшо́к гу́ще кипи́т
Working as a team produces better results
Russian Proverb

Tsuroerusu
Posts: 2551
Joined: Mon Sep 05, 2005 8:51 am
Location: Silkeborg, Denmark
Contact:

Re: Qt version of Mozilla/Firefox

Post by Tsuroerusu » Wed Aug 13, 2008 11:58 am

allix wrote:That is interesting, i don;t think it will make it any faster though, I believe xul is the bloated bit .
I think the port to Qt will make the browser a little bit faster. I have used GNU/Linux 24/7 for four entire years now, so I've used both GTK and Qt apps A LOT. My overall experience is that Qt apps are generally faster and more responsive than GTK apps. I am writing this on my laptop, which runs Fedora 9 with GNOME (KDE 4.x is not for me yet). Unfortunately, I hate most of the GNOME apps, so I have installed KDE 3 apps like Amarok, Kaffeine and digiKam in place of Rhythmbox, Totem and F-Spot/gThumb. Obviously, these take a little longer to load than GTK apps, because their libraries aren't loaded with the desktop itself. But once these apps are running, they are a lot more responsive than GTK apps, even running under GNOME. My laptop has a shit slow 4200 RPM hard drive, which makes me notice every slight increase in performance.
allix wrote:Troels will back me up on this
I guess I finally convinced you. MISSION ACCOMPLISHED!
allix wrote:but a less you have a beefy machine, firefox runs like a snail.
On my desktop machine it slows me entire desktop down to such a degree that just switching virtual desktops is ass slow. And forget about actually browsing more than one web page at once.

During a bsdtalk interview with OpenBSD developer Bob Beck, Will asked him about his favorite text edtior and he said he was "slowly switching to mg, because Emacs is a bloated pig, well Emacs has always been a bloated pig", that's pretty much how I feel about Firefox.
Image
Image

"Hatred does not cease by hatred, but only by love. This is the eternal rule."
- Siddhattha Gotama (Buddha), founder of Buddhism.

asleepfromtheday
Posts: 1
Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 4:29 am

Re: Qt version of Mozilla/Firefox

Post by asleepfromtheday » Fri Aug 15, 2008 6:30 am

What about an ETK version for E17?

Post Reply