What's wrong with RedHat?

Hey drop us a line about the show. Feel free to ask questions, provide feedback and criticism, or just ramble on about anything your little heart desires.

Moderators: snarkout, Patrick, dann

User avatar
gordonmarkus
Posts: 50
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2005 10:19 am
Location: Milton Keynes UK

What's wrong with RedHat?

Post by gordonmarkus » Thu Nov 03, 2005 10:26 am

Hi Everyone,

I'm a bit of a linux newbie, although I've worked off and on with it for about 18 months in all, and I'm definately new to the world of linux radio shows!

Anyway - I've listened to a few shows and there's something that I've picked up on, and that is that nobody ever seems to talk about the RedHat distros. Most of the talk about distros is about debian, slackware or ubuntu. Is there a reason for this that I am missing? As I've only ever used RedHat (7.3, 9 and Enterprise) and am very impressed by what I have seen, I find it a bit strange that nobody else on the radio shows seems to run these distros.

I'd be very interested in any responses, I may even try one of these other distros.

Regards,

-Gordon.
:lol:

User avatar
Patrick
Site Admin
Posts: 2519
Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2004 11:38 am
Location: Easton, PA
Contact:

Post by Patrick » Thu Nov 03, 2005 10:44 am

Most of us started with RedHat and eventually moved on. They are a good company who support GNU/Linux and the F/OSS community. The biggest gripe of RH is RPM. Do a google search on "RPM Hell". This is common of all RPM based distros (Mandriva, Suse, etc..) not just RH. IMHO apt-get is the best package management system in linux. I think it should become the standard for all distros. A lot of other distros now use it, especially the Debian based ones. I recently ran Fedora Core on my MythTV box and was happy with it. In fact I had apt-get running on it. It's come a long way since the early days. Would I have a problem if my desktop at work was running RH? Not at all. It's still way better than WinXP. Another criticism of RH & Fedora is that it's a bloated distro. They tend to give you everything, including the kitchen sink. Currently I run Debian on the server and Kanotix (Debian based distro) on the desktop. I like them a lot. A lot of people gush over Ubuntu. I'm not crazy about it but don't have a problem with people who like it. The hype around Ubuntu has definitely helped publize linux in general. My advice is definitely try some different distros. It's a good learning experience.

User avatar
jsusanka
Posts: 306
Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2005 9:24 am
Contact:

not a thing

Post by jsusanka » Thu Nov 03, 2005 11:33 am

Would I have a problem if my desktop at work was running RH? Not at all. It's still way better than WinXP. Another criticism of RH & Fedora is that it's a bloated distro. They tend to give you everything, including the kitchen sink. Currently I run Debian on the server and Kanotix (Debian based distro) on the desktop. I like them a lot. A lot of people gush over Ubuntu. I'm not crazy about it but don't have a problem with people who like it. The hype around Ubuntu has definitely helped publize linux in general. My advice is definitely try some different distros. It's a good learning experience.
ditto what pat says - I currently run Ubuntu and I administer Redhat AS and ES (and Sun Solaris) servers at work. I also run fedora and Ubuntu and Suse on the desktop at work with windows being forced down my throat but I usually fing myself using ubuntu most of the time.

Redhat is fine but definitely try a few distros and have fun with it. I still always try the different distros when their latest and greatest comes out and I have a blast doing it and learn something at the same time.

Redhat contributes a lot to the community and I am very grateful for that.
I do like kanotix too - I have tried it and I did like it and do like the fact it is compatible with debian repositories and does seem to be one of the most responsive faster distros.

I didn't even mention Mandriva (formerly Mandrake) or Slackware but one of the biggest problems I have is picking a distro because they are so high quality today you are safe going with any of them.

Tsuroerusu
Posts: 2551
Joined: Mon Sep 05, 2005 8:51 am
Location: Silkeborg, Denmark
Contact:

Post by Tsuroerusu » Thu Nov 03, 2005 11:49 am

I started out using Mandrake Linux 10.0 (I didn't start with Red Hat because it uses GNOME by default and when I try to make the GTK apps look more KDE-ish it just screws stuff up, I needed a KDE-centric distro), in June last year (Please mote that I've litterally turned on the hypernation features of my brain to learn to use Linux and UNIX because I just don't wanna use crabby operating systems like Windows) and as Pat said I surely ran into RPM hell, today I run SUSE Linux, which also uses RPM, but my feeling is that they've done a lot better job to avoid the issue a little more, one thing I like about SUSE is that there are so many packages included with the distro and you can choose to install 'em or not, when I install a new version of SUSE on my own machine I install a lot of stuff because I like to see what's works best for me and the I cut the stuff I don't need out, for example on Linux I can't find one single video player than handles all my needs perfectly, sometimes Xine crabs out on me and I turn to MPlayer and vice versa. What I personally do to avoid RPM hell with SUSE 10 is to install, like Pat did with Fedora, apt4rpm which wraps Debian's apt tools around the RPM package manager, what I've also done recently is to use stuff like Synaptic and Smart to manage packages on my system, what I like about Smart is that it doesn't try to play Mr. Wise guy and force you to take action when there's a dependency issue (For example RPM thinks Wine 07xxxx is newner than Wine 0.9 Beta which it isn't), when there is it informs me about it and if I know there ain't a problem I just lock the troubling package to a specific version and it won't bother me anymore.

I know many people say that SUSE is bloated, but I actually like having a few video player and both OpenOffice and KOffice, why? As I said before not one video player suits all my needs, personally I like japanese anime, and a lot of the stuff I watch has multiple audio channels for different languages (In most cases it's english and japanese) and some video player GUIs just doesn't have a feature to switch between those, for example, my default video player KPlayer, which I like because it can act like the well known old Windows Media Player 6.04 which was a pretty much barebone player which just did what it should and did it right, sometimes with a few hacks. But KPlayer doesn't allow me to switch between audio channels, so I use Kaffeine for that. And sometimes when I have a lot of programs open at the same time I just don't feel like starting up OpenOffice which eats a good chunk of RAM and I'm not into macros and stuff so I just use KOffice which is a slick looking and pretty speedy office suite IMHO (Yes I could use AbiWord but that one is a GNOME app, and I hate sitting in a shiny KDE desktop and get the gray toned colors of GNOME, light is good for your mood you know).

Right now I'm sitting here on my chair and anxiously waiting for FreeBSD 6.0, I've played with it for a while on an older system and I just love it's package management system, the so called ports system, because if there is like a name mismatch in the dependency calculations you can edit that, for example the default Linux environment it can sort of simulate would be Red Hat 8 (In order to run Linux apps), I prefer it to simulate SUSE 9.3 so I installed the SUSE 9.3 components, and then some other package wanted the Red Hat stuff and I just told it "OK, look over there" by telling it to depend on linux-suse-9.3 :wink:
I just don't understand why Debian or Red Hat did this with their package managers a long time ago.

User avatar
Patrick
Site Admin
Posts: 2519
Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2004 11:38 am
Location: Easton, PA
Contact:

Post by Patrick » Thu Nov 03, 2005 12:02 pm

FYI, our Asterisk server was installed via Asterisk@home which uses CentOS (a Red Hat derivative). So TLLTS is running RH on one of our boxes. We're also running Debian, Slackware, Ubuntu, etc..

User avatar
CptnObvious999
Posts: 798
Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 7:54 pm
Location: Maryland
Contact:

Post by CptnObvious999 » Thu Nov 03, 2005 5:57 pm

RedHat switched from offering a free version of their distro to stickly enterprise after RedHat 9 I think. They have a free community based one now called Fedora but unless I was willing to spend a couple hundred dollars I wouldn't be able to get a newer version of it. RPMs are a good idea however since Linux is build with the power of UNIX it is modularized meaning programs can depend on other programs or libraries to run. With RPM you have to manualing find these on the internet (google is your friend). Also RPM based packages only work on the specific distro it was built for like Mandrake 10 or SUSE 9.1 etc. Using other package management systems there is a database (or in debians case, several databases or repositories) that has lots of packages in them and it will automatically download them and install them to have a working program (at least thats the theory however nothing is perfect ;-) ).

I think debian based distros are better than rpm ones but I personally like portage better as it allows more control over the packages, everything is superfast, the packages are spread all over the place, and since everything is built from source if a package isn't in portage you can easily compile it manually and get it to work. Compiling takes a while but my machine is fast and it has every package I've ever needed.

Tsuroerusu
Posts: 2551
Joined: Mon Sep 05, 2005 8:51 am
Location: Silkeborg, Denmark
Contact:

Post by Tsuroerusu » Thu Nov 03, 2005 6:22 pm

CptnObvious999 wrote:RedHat switched from offering a free version of their distro to stickly enterprise after RedHat 9 I think. They have a free community based one now called Fedora but unless I was willing to spend a couple hundred dollars I wouldn't be able to get a newer version of it. RPMs are a good idea however since Linux is build with the power of UNIX it is modularized meaning programs can depend on other programs or libraries to run. With RPM you have to manualing find these on the internet (google is your friend). Also RPM based packages only work on the specific distro it was built for like Mandrake 10 or SUSE 9.1 etc. Using other package management systems there is a database (or in debians case, several databases or repositories) that has lots of packages in them and it will automatically download them and install them to have a working program (at least thats the theory however nothing is perfect ;-) ).

I think debian based distros are better than rpm ones but I personally like portage better as it allows more control over the packages, everything is superfast, the packages are spread all over the place, and since everything is built from source if a package isn't in portage you can easily compile it manually and get it to work. Compiling takes a while but my machine is fast and it has every package I've ever needed.
Sometimes RPMs from a previous version of a distro do actually work on a newer version if the dependencies aren't too crazy. For example, I run SUSE 10 and I have gotten several packages built for SUSE 9.3 to work fine on SUSE 10, you just have to REALLY pay attention to the dependencies and make sure taht something doesn't get wrong, but with some packages you can use it with a newer version of the distro, as long as the dependencies keeps it's cool and doesn't go completely nuts :wink:

User avatar
snarkout
Site Admin
Posts: 1342
Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2005 9:35 pm

Post by snarkout » Thu Nov 03, 2005 10:24 pm

The main thing people have against redhat is that it lost its 1337 status a long time ago. After that, it's the fact that they went to a pay-to-play market, and created fedora to be used as their testbed. Fedora and redhat are both fine distros, but IME for any of them to be very useful for home desktop use you have to enable several 3rd party repositories. Occasionally, these repos (*cough*fuckatrpms*cough*) break things.

However, fedora really is a great distro for the most part, and you'll be able to do anything with it you can on any other. In fact, IME, some things about it are a lot nicer than their debian/ubuntu counterparts. My main complaint with it is that historically it has been terribly unstable for at least 3 months of it's 6 month life-cycle *every* release. I think the 6 month release cycle is going to prove to chase away more potential users than it attracts. It's one thing that I find completely unforgivable about the state of linux these days. If sid weren't such a whore these days, I'd very seriously consider switching to it or kanotix. As it is, I'm doing the kubuntu thing (I can't stand gnome -- I switched to it for two months, and became very grouchy. It's "professional looking" but that's it IMO -- all flash and no cash. I don't give a rat's ass what the guys from LUGRadio think.)
Shared pain is lessened, shared joy is increased; thus do we refute entropy.
--Spider Robinson

User avatar
CptnObvious999
Posts: 798
Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 7:54 pm
Location: Maryland
Contact:

Post by CptnObvious999 » Thu Nov 03, 2005 10:59 pm

I tried the AMD64 Kanotix version it froze after 5 mins of use so I tried the regular Kanotix and doing a dist-upgrade broke my system too bad and the were no respositories with some packages I like (like cube) so I went back to Gentoo ;-). Debian is a good system however if you want to get packages outside their core repositories things will break.

Tsuroerusu
Posts: 2551
Joined: Mon Sep 05, 2005 8:51 am
Location: Silkeborg, Denmark
Contact:

Post by Tsuroerusu » Thu Nov 03, 2005 11:25 pm

Snarkout wrote:The main thing people have against redhat is that it lost its 1337 status a long time ago. After that, it's the fact that they went to a pay-to-play market, and created fedora to be used as their testbed. Fedora and redhat are both fine distros, but IME for any of them to be very useful for home desktop use you have to enable several 3rd party repositories. Occasionally, these repos (*cough*fuckatrpms*cough*) break things.

However, fedora really is a great distro for the most part, and you'll be able to do anything with it you can on any other. In fact, IME, some things about it are a lot nicer than their debian/ubuntu counterparts. My main complaint with it is that historically it has been terribly unstable for at least 3 months of it's 6 month life-cycle *every* release. I think the 6 month release cycle is going to prove to chase away more potential users than it attracts. It's one thing that I find completely unforgivable about the state of linux these days. If sid weren't such a whore these days, I'd very seriously consider switching to it or kanotix. As it is, I'm doing the kubuntu thing (I can't stand gnome -- I switched to it for two months, and became very grouchy. It's "professional looking" but that's it IMO -- all flash and no cash. I don't give a rat's ass what the guys from LUGRadio think.)
Well, I really don't have anything against Red Hat, I have A LOT more against Linspire than I do Red Hat, because Red Hat at least understands UNIX security and has the default system set up so that you are prompted to create a seperate user instead of running as root with just a warning, I know that Kevin Carmony said they don't wanna force people to do that, but some people are just too dumb to actually think too much about security and needs to have everything done for them, like kids in a kindergarden.
But I also think that Linspire does a lot of good stuff, instead of developing Lsongs as a proprietary app, they GPLed the thing which I think was a good thing to do, and they also sponsor great sites like kde-apps.org and kde-look.org, plus they sponsor Kopete which by the way is gonna introduce webcam support in KDE 3.5.

If you look at Red Hat's "before-Fedora"-distros, they were, like SUSE previously were, developed by Red Hat and users could submit bug reports but not directly get involved with the distro. The reason Red Hat charges a bit for their enterprise distro is that hey have gotten big-deal certifications on it so that IT-staffs can feel comfortable in using Red Hat Enterprise, and I have to admit I did try it out for fun... and I found it very nice, not bad at all, but I still like SUSE a lot better, I think that their management tools are just vastly surperior to Red Hat's.

The reason I'm not running a Debian system today, is that I simply can't find a Debian distro that suits my needs, which would be:

A nice polished KDE desktop out of the box
Very recent, but stable versions of KDE and GNOME (I kind of slave GNOME to KDE so that stuff like Totem fits into KDE's look and just play nicely along).
A nice set of GUI management tools (Yes I could use the commandline, but I like to have a good bundle of convienience at hand when I need it, for example when I were doing preparation for exams in the spring, a new version of KDE came out and I wanted to upgrade because I knew a very irating bug that annoyed me was fixed)

I know that someone is instantly gonna suggest me Kanotix or Kubuntu, but I've tried 'em both, and none of them suited my needs as good as SUSE or FreeBSD does (FreeBSD has a pretty decent text menu configuration system called sysinstall which I can live with and I love the package management system that it uses).
When I tried Kubuntu Breezy I instantly disliked it's "Kubuntu-KDE-settings" and I tried and tried and tried to just get stock kde.org settings and I could't find them so I threw it right off my system, Kanotix was a lot better but the polish and very recent GNOME system just wasn't there when I tried it.
I don't give a rat's ass what the guys from LUGRadio think.
ROFLMFAO, dude you crack me up. Good one man.
I agree man, those guys have a lot of weird opinions IMHO, but they're also quite funny to listen to sometimes, but nothing made me laugh my ass off as much as the story Dann told in the OGG special in episode #93, I first stopped laughing about 3 hours after the episode ended, it was hilarious.

User avatar
gordonmarkus
Posts: 50
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2005 10:19 am
Location: Milton Keynes UK

Post by gordonmarkus » Fri Nov 04, 2005 6:35 am

Hi everyone,

Thanks very much for you comments - they are really informative. I must admit that I have had some problems with the rpm packages, but I thought that was down to my incompetance rather than a problem with the system! I had particular problems when I tried to install apache/php/mysql for my web forum - getting packages that worked with each other was a real nightmare, as I only found out that there were incompatibilities between versions once 1 or 2 of the others were installed! Also now that everything is working, but not on the latest versions - my desktop continually has the flashing exclamation advising that my system needs updating, however I am concerned that if I update everything then new incompatibilities will be found and my server will cease to function.

On the subject of changing distros - is this a fairly easy process? Or is it a case of backing everything up and then a complete re-install. I seem to remember my RH9 install took several hours, and that's not something that I really what to have to go through too often!

Thanks again for your comments,

-Gordon.

User avatar
Patrick
Site Admin
Posts: 2519
Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2004 11:38 am
Location: Easton, PA
Contact:

Post by Patrick » Fri Nov 04, 2005 6:44 am

Tsuroerusu wrote:but nothing made me laugh my ass off as much as the story Dann told in the OGG special in episode #93, I first stopped laughing about 3 hours after the episode ended, it was hilarious.
Dan's infamous jogging with the dog story. I think I soiled my shorts listening to that one as well!

User avatar
snarkout
Site Admin
Posts: 1342
Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2005 9:35 pm

Post by snarkout » Fri Nov 04, 2005 8:51 am

FWIW, I hat the new "Preference Panel" that the kubuntu guys decided to use as well. However, by changing the command for the System Settings menu option to "kcontrol" you can get the regular KDE control center back.

I agree, however, that the kubuntu guys make a bunch of tweaks to the system I don't want or need. I don't really like the "Simplified Browser" view they ship as default for Konqueror -- The main compalint I have is that the "Window" aind "Go" menus are missing, and with the minimal amount of looking I've done, there seems to be no easy way to get them back. Still, katapult and konqueror based "locate" commands make up for that. There's also the fact that a number of packages for kubuntu seem to suffer from problems I don't notice on other distros. Still, it's what I'm running right now.

I've personally been having a very difficult time settling on a distro recently, much like many people I know. I'm going to have to blame the 6 month cycle that seems to be the craze right now - I really think it's the completely wrong way to do things. I also blame the bizarre dichotomy that is (k)ubuntu - they seem to want to be a cutting edge distro, so they package the absolute latest and greatest at the time of release. They then completely freeze stuff for the next 6 months, even packages that have known major bugs (mplayer or kaffeine anyone?). They also seem to want to appeal to the lowest common denominator in terms of both knowledge and hardware, so instead of using splashy or something, they use usplash, and they *don't* turn DMA on on *most* optical drives for some unexplainably bizarre reason, but have enabled many popup info balloons that drive some seasoned users nuts. You can't have the fastest and cheapest car, as a friend of mine says. If they want to capture the 3rd world country market, they should go that direction. If they want to capture the bleeding edge market, they should go that direction. The fact that they're trying to capture both is just plain weird. The fact that they constantly seem to be branching is bizarre as well. I don't know about any of you folks, but there is simply no way I'd run ubuntu as a server anywhere except in my own home -- even then, their sh!tty release cycle would make it very unattractive. Honestly, I can't think of a single reason I'd run ubuntu rather than debian in a server situation. All this being said, I have kubuntu installed on both my lappy as well as my main workstation, and for the most part like the distro. I wish it weren't the bastard stepchild of ubuntu, but it is, and there's not much that can be done about that.
Shared pain is lessened, shared joy is increased; thus do we refute entropy.
--Spider Robinson

Tsuroerusu
Posts: 2551
Joined: Mon Sep 05, 2005 8:51 am
Location: Silkeborg, Denmark
Contact:

Post by Tsuroerusu » Fri Nov 04, 2005 9:10 am

gordonmarkus wrote:Hi everyone,

Thanks very much for you comments - they are really informative. I must admit that I have had some problems with the rpm packages, but I thought that was down to my incompetance rather than a problem with the system! I had particular problems when I tried to install apache/php/mysql for my web forum - getting packages that worked with each other was a real nightmare, as I only found out that there were incompatibilities between versions once 1 or 2 of the others were installed! Also now that everything is working, but not on the latest versions - my desktop continually has the flashing exclamation advising that my system needs updating, however I am concerned that if I update everything then new incompatibilities will be found and my server will cease to function.

On the subject of changing distros - is this a fairly easy process? Or is it a case of backing everything up and then a complete re-install. I seem to remember my RH9 install took several hours, and that's not something that I really what to have to go through too often!

Thanks again for your comments,

-Gordon.
Unless you're running a Debian based distro, and even sometime if you do, it's back up and reinstall. If you wanna set up a web server very eaisily I would seriously recommend SUSE, they have a nice GUI for handling Apache, it took me litterally two minutes to have it running with PHP Perl.

Red Hat 9 was ages ago man, two years is like eternity in the world of free and open source software because things just evolve so quickly.

I say go with a friendly distro that has some good quality GUI configuration tools if you're not too comfortable with the commandline configuration, sometimes Apache can be a real pain in the ass on this one.

Patrick wrote:
Tsuroerusu wrote:but nothing made me laugh my ass off as much as the story Dann told in the OGG special in episode #93, I first stopped laughing about 3 hours after the episode ended, it was hilarious.
Dan's infamous jogging with the dog story. I think I soiled my shorts listening to that one as well!
It sure sounded like that :wink:

When Dann was saying "And I'm trying to aim into the bag" it sounded like you got choked because of the laughing :lol:

Snarkout wrote:FWIW, I hat the new "Preference Panel" that the kubuntu guys decided to use as well. However, by changing the command for the System Settings menu option to "kcontrol" you can get the regular KDE control center back.

I agree, however, that the kubuntu guys make a bunch of tweaks to the system I don't want or need. I don't really like the "Simplified Browser" view they ship as default for Konqueror -- The main compalint I have is that the "Window" aind "Go" menus are missing, and with the minimal amount of looking I've done, there seems to be no easy way to get them back. Still, katapult and konqueror based "locate" commands make up for that. There's also the fact that a number of packages for kubuntu seem to suffer from problems I don't notice on other distros. Still, it's what I'm running right now.

I've personally been having a very difficult time settling on a distro recently, much like many people I know. I'm going to have to blame the 6 month cycle that seems to be the craze right now - I really think it's the completely wrong way to do things. I also blame the bizarre dichotomy that is (k)ubuntu - they seem to want to be a cutting edge distro, so they package the absolute latest and greatest at the time of release. They then completely freeze stuff for the next 6 months, even packages that have known major bugs (mplayer or kaffeine anyone?). They also seem to want to appeal to the lowest common denominator in terms of both knowledge and hardware, so instead of using splashy or something, they use usplash, and they *don't* turn DMA on on *most* optical drives for some unexplainably bizarre reason, but have enabled many popup info balloons that drive some seasoned users nuts. You can't have the fastest and cheapest car, as a friend of mine says. If they want to capture the 3rd world country market, they should go that direction. If they want to capture the bleeding edge market, they should go that direction. The fact that they're trying to capture both is just plain weird. The fact that they constantly seem to be branching is bizarre as well. I don't know about any of you folks, but there is simply no way I'd run ubuntu as a server anywhere except in my own home -- even then, their sh!tty release cycle would make it very unattractive. Honestly, I can't think of a single reason I'd run ubuntu rather than debian in a server situation. All this being said, I have kubuntu installed on both my lappy as well as my main workstation, and for the most part like the distro. I wish it weren't the bastard stepchild of ubuntu, but it is, and there's not much that can be done about that.
What I just can't understand is all the hype about Ubuntu!
They say it's an easy distro to use and it's good for first time users, I'm here to tell you that IT IS NOT!!!

If you're a user just coming from Windows, I don't think you'll be too happy with Ubuntu, I think it seriously lags when it comes to configuration tools, and yes I know there is ubuntuguide.org or whatever, but my mum wouldn't be able to figure all that stuff out!!!

I just don't understand how you can say a young distro like Ubuntu is eaisier o use than SUSE (1.0 was released in March of 1994) and Mandriva (1.0 was released in July of 1998) that has had over twice the time to evolve, and in case of SUSE, OVER TEN YEARS!!!

Some people say that things are well intergrated in Ubuntu and I can agree more to that, but when I throw an empty CD-R into my SUSE box it asks me if I wanna start k3b, or if I pop in an audio CD, it asks me if I wanna start KDE's CD player, I can't rememer it's named off the top of my head right now, and etc....
I know SUSE uses RPM, but they havn't had as much forking of their distro as Red Hat has, which is part is caused by the fact that YaST was proprietary, and couldn't be redistributed before Novell bought SUSE, I really don't run into dependency issues that often, the few 3rd party places I use that provides things like MPlayer do a great job of not conflicting with each other.

Anyway, enough with my SUSE talk for now :D :P

Just as a final note, the thing that really pissed me off about Kubuntu was that they wouldn't allow me to get to KDE's default desktop settings, all the time it wanted to use it's "simplified settings" and compared to what I'm used to, it was DAMN hard to use.
One thing I did like though, just so it's not all negative, was the new Adept package manager, huge improvement over the crabby Kynaptic they used in the Hoary release.

User avatar
Gomer_X
Posts: 901
Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 1:31 pm
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
Contact:

Post by Gomer_X » Fri Nov 04, 2005 9:33 am

Patrick wrote:Most of us started with RedHat and eventually moved on. They are a good company who support GNU/Linux and the F/OSS community. The biggest gripe of RH is RPM. Do a google search on "RPM Hell". This is common of all RPM based distros (Mandriva, Suse, etc..) not just RH.
Just to clear up a common misconception, RPM hell has not been a reality for years. Red Hat has had up2date for a long time, which handles dependencies just fine. If you really want to cause yourself pain you can use RPM directly to install packages, but there's no need to.

Fedora has shipped with YUM since Core 1, and it's an excellent package manager. It's heavily under development and has become quite mature and fast. Fedora Core 4 shipped with the Fedora Extras repository enabled by default. If you want proprietary plugins, all you have to do is install one package from the Livna repository, and they're available. Yum will manage dependencies across all these repositories without conflict.

If that's not enough, you can install apt-get on Fedora. There are other repositories if the main ones don't have what you want, and there are tools that will manage dependencies even across repos that are known to conflict, without breaking the system.

Fedora Core 5 will ship with the PUP package manager (Package UPdater), which has a GUI and is supposed to be very good. It will replace not only other package managers but also the "Add/Remove programs" tool.

Post Reply