Nice review of VectorLinux 5.1.1 SOHO

Hey drop us a line about the show. Feel free to ask questions, provide feedback and criticism, or just ramble on about anything your little heart desires.

Moderators: snarkout, Patrick, dann

Post Reply
User avatar
Wally Balljacker
Posts: 1227
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 3:32 am
Location: University of Massachusetts - Lowell
Contact:

Nice review of VectorLinux 5.1.1 SOHO

Post by Wally Balljacker » Thu Feb 16, 2006 2:48 pm

http://madpenguin.org/cms/?m=show&id=6190

Looks like another distro I need to try out. It's basically just Slackware with some nice desktop improvements, and a GTK frontend for Slapt-get, called GSlapt.

User avatar
Gomer_X
Posts: 901
Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 1:31 pm
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
Contact:

Re: Nice review of VectorLinux 5.1.1 SOHO

Post by Gomer_X » Fri Feb 17, 2006 9:09 am

Wally Balljacker wrote:http://madpenguin.org/cms/?m=show&id=6190

Looks like another distro I need to try out. It's basically just Slackware with some nice desktop improvements, and a GTK frontend for Slapt-get, called GSlapt.
I was under the impression that the selling point of Vector was that it was compiled for newer processors (like Arch) and used stripped binaries for speed. I haven't looked at it for a while, though. It's supposed to be pretty fast.

User avatar
snarkout
Site Admin
Posts: 1342
Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2005 9:35 pm

Post by snarkout » Fri Feb 17, 2006 9:30 am

Yeah, I read that the other day - it did a good job of selling vector. I wish someone would come out with a light-weight distro like that, aimed at lappys.
Shared pain is lessened, shared joy is increased; thus do we refute entropy.
--Spider Robinson

Judland
Posts: 1030
Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2004 12:55 pm

Post by Judland » Fri Feb 17, 2006 1:13 pm

I recently resurrected an old Toshiba Satellite laptop at the office. Damn Small Linux and Vector Linux where the only two distros. (out of the half dozen that I tried) that installed properly on it.

So, being configured for only "newer" hardware doesn't seem to be the case.

User avatar
Gomer_X
Posts: 901
Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 1:31 pm
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
Contact:

Post by Gomer_X » Sat Feb 18, 2006 11:41 am

Judland wrote:I recently resurrected an old Toshiba Satellite laptop at the office. Damn Small Linux and Vector Linux where the only two distros. (out of the half dozen that I tried) that installed properly on it.

So, being configured for only "newer" hardware doesn't seem to be the case.
Newer as in i686 versus i586 (or even 486). Lots of distros still include i586 compatibility in their packages.

Fedora compiles (kernels at least) with Pentium 4 optimizations, but i586 compatibility, so it's faster on newer hardware, but compatible all the way back to the Pentium.

Post Reply