How many here were affected by by the broken Xserver update?

Hey drop us a line about the show. Feel free to ask questions, provide feedback and criticism, or just ramble on about anything your little heart desires.

Moderators: snarkout, Patrick, dann

Post Reply
User avatar
greggh
Posts: 1036
Joined: Fri Jun 02, 2006 7:17 pm
Location: Brooklyn, NY USA

How many here were affected by by the broken Xserver update?

Post by greggh » Tue Aug 22, 2006 3:45 pm

http://www.ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=241254

It looks like it affected most ubuntu users who did the update. The shocking thing is that from what I read on the forum it looks like the update was tested by one guy on what he claims were a few machines, and then he pushed to the official repos. That's one hell of a package quality assurance system they have there.

User avatar
Patrick
Site Admin
Posts: 2519
Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2004 11:38 am
Location: Easton, PA
Contact:

Post by Patrick » Tue Aug 22, 2006 4:50 pm

I did not update and was not affected by it.
Ego contemno licentia

User avatar
Patrick
Site Admin
Posts: 2519
Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2004 11:38 am
Location: Easton, PA
Contact:

Post by Patrick » Tue Aug 22, 2006 4:58 pm

After running Arch for a bit I had my share of breakages caused by bleeding edge packages. As a result my upgrade mania has calmed down quite a bit since then. ;)
Ego contemno licentia

User avatar
Gomer_X
Posts: 901
Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 1:31 pm
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
Contact:

Post by Gomer_X » Wed Aug 23, 2006 8:37 am

I run Fedora, a distro which tests important updates before releasing them into the wild.

I was not affected. :D

User avatar
Patrick
Site Admin
Posts: 2519
Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2004 11:38 am
Location: Easton, PA
Contact:

Post by Patrick » Wed Aug 23, 2006 8:42 am

Gomer_X wrote:I run Fedora, a distro which tests important updates before releasing them into the wild.

I was not affected. :D
Hopefully Fedora will give Yum a kick in the ass in the speed column. Apt-get is super fast and there's nothing like getting broken packages in a hurry! ;)
Ego contemno licentia

User avatar
Wally Balljacker
Posts: 1227
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 3:32 am
Location: University of Massachusetts - Lowell
Contact:

Post by Wally Balljacker » Wed Aug 23, 2006 8:58 am

Not affected over here!

User avatar
Gomer_X
Posts: 901
Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 1:31 pm
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
Contact:

Post by Gomer_X » Wed Aug 23, 2006 9:06 am

Patrick wrote: Hopefully Fedora will give Yum a kick in the ass in the speed column. Apt-get is super fast and there's nothing like getting broken packages in a hurry! ;)
Unfortunately "super fast" means nothing. I'd be interested in some actual numbers to compare with because I don't find yum that slow (especially since they switched to running from cache, rather than downloading headers every time).

I do know that someone is rewriting parts in C to speed up some of the processing intensive stuff.

There is also a "fastest mirror" plugin that pings the mirror list and selects the fastest for your location.

User avatar
Patrick
Site Admin
Posts: 2519
Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2004 11:38 am
Location: Easton, PA
Contact:

Post by Patrick » Wed Aug 23, 2006 9:29 am

Gomer_X wrote: Unfortunately "super fast" means nothing. I'd be interested in some actual numbers to compare with because I don't find yum that slow (especially since they switched to running from cache, rather than downloading headers every time).
I know the Fedora guys are aware of the speed issues of yum. You've previously made us aware of the workarounds to this. I just couldn't resist busting. :)
Ego contemno licentia

User avatar
yeti
Posts: 21
Joined: Tue Aug 08, 2006 3:45 pm
Location: Londinium

Post by yeti » Wed Aug 23, 2006 12:18 pm

i got the broken update and then the fixed update today, but no reboots from me in between so no problems encountered

User avatar
Gomer_X
Posts: 901
Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 1:31 pm
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
Contact:

Post by Gomer_X » Thu Aug 24, 2006 9:21 am

Patrick wrote: I know the Fedora guys are aware of the speed issues of yum. You've previously made us aware of the workarounds to this. I just couldn't resist busting. :)
Well, you gotta take the shtos where you can. :D

User avatar
DaveQB
Posts: 188
Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2005 6:50 am
Location: Sydney
Contact:

Post by DaveQB » Thu Aug 24, 2006 10:05 am

yeti wrote:i got the broken update and then the fixed update today, but no reboots from me in between so no problems encountered
I have only seen one Xorg update and applied it. Havent reboot my Desktop for a month here nor restarted X so haven't had any problems.

No updates since; but maybe I only got the fixed package.

PS just checked and I have 10.4, the "good" version.
Linux david 2.6.29.3-desktop-1mnb #1 SMP Thu May 14 15:19:40 EDT 2009 x86_64 AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 6000+
Distro: Mandriva 2009.1

User avatar
no1important
Posts: 55
Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2005 8:33 pm
Location: Vancouver BC
Contact:

Post by no1important » Sat Aug 26, 2006 5:58 am

Not I, But I run Kubuntu and after reading it I was concerned it may of effected Kubuntu but it did not.

User avatar
platypus_low
Posts: 43
Joined: Tue Jul 25, 2006 5:07 am

Post by platypus_low » Sun Aug 27, 2006 10:19 pm

Patrick wrote:
Gomer_X wrote:I run Fedora, a distro which tests important updates before releasing them into the wild.

I was not affected. :D
Hopefully Fedora will give Yum a kick in the ass in the speed column. Apt-get is super fast and there's nothing like getting broken packages in a hurry! ;)
I think I will go nuts if i read anymore of this bitchin' about yum speed ... especially since there is an alternative out there ... Please just Run smart on fedora !!

Post Reply