How many here were affected by by the broken Xserver update?
Moderators: snarkout, Patrick, dann
How many here were affected by by the broken Xserver update?
http://www.ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=241254
It looks like it affected most ubuntu users who did the update. The shocking thing is that from what I read on the forum it looks like the update was tested by one guy on what he claims were a few machines, and then he pushed to the official repos. That's one hell of a package quality assurance system they have there.
It looks like it affected most ubuntu users who did the update. The shocking thing is that from what I read on the forum it looks like the update was tested by one guy on what he claims were a few machines, and then he pushed to the official repos. That's one hell of a package quality assurance system they have there.
- Wally Balljacker
- Posts: 1227
- Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 3:32 am
- Location: University of Massachusetts - Lowell
- Contact:
Unfortunately "super fast" means nothing. I'd be interested in some actual numbers to compare with because I don't find yum that slow (especially since they switched to running from cache, rather than downloading headers every time).Patrick wrote: Hopefully Fedora will give Yum a kick in the ass in the speed column. Apt-get is super fast and there's nothing like getting broken packages in a hurry!
I do know that someone is rewriting parts in C to speed up some of the processing intensive stuff.
There is also a "fastest mirror" plugin that pings the mirror list and selects the fastest for your location.
I know the Fedora guys are aware of the speed issues of yum. You've previously made us aware of the workarounds to this. I just couldn't resist busting.Gomer_X wrote: Unfortunately "super fast" means nothing. I'd be interested in some actual numbers to compare with because I don't find yum that slow (especially since they switched to running from cache, rather than downloading headers every time).
Ego contemno licentia
I have only seen one Xorg update and applied it. Havent reboot my Desktop for a month here nor restarted X so haven't had any problems.yeti wrote:i got the broken update and then the fixed update today, but no reboots from me in between so no problems encountered
No updates since; but maybe I only got the fixed package.
PS just checked and I have 10.4, the "good" version.
Linux david 2.6.29.3-desktop-1mnb #1 SMP Thu May 14 15:19:40 EDT 2009 x86_64 AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 6000+
Distro: Mandriva 2009.1
Distro: Mandriva 2009.1
- no1important
- Posts: 55
- Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2005 8:33 pm
- Location: Vancouver BC
- Contact:
- platypus_low
- Posts: 43
- Joined: Tue Jul 25, 2006 5:07 am
I think I will go nuts if i read anymore of this bitchin' about yum speed ... especially since there is an alternative out there ... Please just Run smart on fedora !!Patrick wrote:Hopefully Fedora will give Yum a kick in the ass in the speed column. Apt-get is super fast and there's nothing like getting broken packages in a hurry!Gomer_X wrote:I run Fedora, a distro which tests important updates before releasing them into the wild.
I was not affected.